Vol. 3, No. 6 — June 2026Independent since 2024

TheCompound Journal

Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain

A monthly journal of record.
30 issues · 32 contributors
Not medical advice. We sell nothing.

Twenty Vendors, Twenty Vials

The Journal buys one vial from each of the twenty companies whose names appear most often on the label, and submits every one to independent analysis.

12 instalments · edited by Noor Haddadin · 4 Jan 2024 – 15 Apr 2026

A purchasing exercise conducted at arm’s length, with the orders placed as an ordinary customer, the samples split, and duplicates sent blind to more than one laboratory. We publish the purchase date, the price paid, the method used and the result — and we publish the disagreements between laboratories rather than averaging them away.

Instalments

12 of 12 planned

Part 1 — The Ledger

The submitted sample: the weakest link in the whole system

What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.

Sunniva Ørstavik
4 Jan 2024
1,779 words

Part 2 — Explainers

Why two wavelengths on one run would settle several arguments

Non-chromophoric components — counter-ions, salts, some excipients — contribute mass to the vial and nothing at all to the chromatogram.

Marguerite Vasseur
23 Mar 2024
3,133 words

Part 3 — Analytics

Three services, one lot, and a spread of two and a half points

Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.

Roshan Devakumar
3 Jun 2024
2,004 words

Part 4 — The Ledger

Six words a verification badge would need to mean anything

What a verification mark would have to carry to be checkable: a date, a lot, a method, a submitter and a link to the report.

Noor Haddadin
26 Aug 2024
2,094 words

Part 5 — The Ledger

Reproducibility, measured rather than assumed

The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.

Noor Haddadin
10 Nov 2024
1,729 words

Part 6 — Analytics

Reproducibility, measured rather than assumed

Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.

Nikolaj Brandvold
7 Feb 2025
1,694 words

Part 7 — The Ledger

A tested vial is evidence about a vial

What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.

Noor Haddadin
20 Apr 2025
3,140 words

Part 8 — The Supply Chain

The submitted sample: the weakest link in the whole system

Every third-party report in this market describes a sample somebody chose to send. That choice is outside the laboratory’s control and outside its records.

Evander Sittig
19 Jun 2025
1,674 words

Part 9 — Explainers

Retention time is not identity

Matching a retention time against a standard is evidence of consistency, not proof of identity. Two different species can elute at the same time on one method.

Delphine Ruzek
2 Sep 2025
1,661 words

Part 10 — The Ledger

How a claim degrades between the bench and the listing

A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.

Noor Haddadin
17 Nov 2025
2,071 words

Part 11 — Analytics

The badge economy, and what it is actually certifying

A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.

Wren Kealoha
1 Feb 2026
1,632 words

Part 12 — The Supply Chain

Same material, different gradients, different answers

The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.

Evander Sittig
15 Apr 2026
1,963 words